Week 3: An Interesting One

Mar 10, 2019

Hi there, welcome back to Blog #3!

This week was a very interesting week, to say the least. The luciferase assay that I briefly outlined last week did not turn out as expected — at all. Before we go into that, let me summarize what I tried to accomplish.

As I mentioned last week, transfection is the process of trying to insert nucleic acids (in my case a plasmid) into a eukaryotic cell. To do this, we used an enzymatic reaction to poke holes into kidney cells, which consequently allowed the plasmid to enter the cell. After that, we allow them to recover for 48 hours, then proceed to measure the levels of luciferase in each group of cells.

I wanted to test 2 different versions of the RBM20 activity reporter that I had created. I did not know which one would work more efficiently (or at all), so I wanted to compare how much luciferase was produced by cells with the original plasmid (no interrupting sequence) and my two different reporters. I hoped to see that the cells with the new reporters produce low levels of luciferase relative to the original plasmid (which should produce a lot of luciferase). However, after doing my experiment, I got results that were the complete opposite. The cells that had my new reporter plasmids were producing an amazing amount of luciferase whereas cells with the original plasmid were producing about 100x less luciferase. I have no idea why this is occurring, so I’m in the process of running a reverse transcription reaction, where I use enzymes to convert the mRNA in the cell to DNA, which I can then sequence to find out what is going wrong.

Fortunately, I do have some great news for today’s blog: I have beating cells!!! I’m attaching a small video of them to this blog post. Note: They seem to be beating very slowly, and that’s because I’ve just placed them in a solution containing no glucose. This process, which we call starvation (obviously), is designed to kill any other non-cardiomyocytes in the well so that we can obtain a pure sample of only heart cells.



3 Replies to “Week 3: An Interesting One”

  1. Sahithi P. says:

    Encountering a problem like this so early in your project is really helpful, actually. You learn how to bounce back from results that are completely unexpected. Now, your results section will be super interesting haha. Also, your beating heart cells look so cool omg.

  2. Jake I. says:

    An interesting one indeed! I am curious as to why you found the opposite of what you expected. I had no idea what beating cells looked like.

  3. Pranavamshiva V. says:

    So if the results turned out to be the complete opposite, I’m guessing it’s less likely that there was a procedural mistake. Has this happened to anyone before, or is there any article about it? Maybe that can answer your questions and confirm your reverse transcription reaction

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.